On Wednesday, January 27, 2021, a Review Application Hearing was held against the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 285 K/Pid.Sus/2015 dated February 23, 2015 Jo. Verdict of the Corruption Criminal Court at the High Court of DKI Jakarta No. 72/PID/TPK/2014/PT. Dki Jakarta dated November 18, 2014 Jo. Verdict of the Corruption Criminal Court at the Central Jakarta District Court No. 44/PID. SUS/TPK/2014/PN. JKT, I’M SORRY. PST dated August 28, 2014 as registered in Register Deed No. 62/AKTA. Pid. SUS/PK/TPK/2020/PN.Jkt.Pst on behalf of Ratu Atut Chosiyah as The Review Applicant.The session was attended by Ratu Atut Chosiyah accompanied by Novian & Partners with the agenda of the session submission of Written Evidence and Examination of Forensic Digital Experts: Josua M Sinambela, S.T., M.Eng, CEH, CHFI, ECSA, ACE, CCNP, CCNA, CompTIA Security.
In the testimony under oath and before the court, Josua M Sinambela, S.T., M.Eng explained about the validity of digital evidence in the Trial. Experts explain that the first thing that needs to be done to make a digital evidence a legitimate evidence tool is to secure the original evidence or also called the master of evidence. In the case of digital evidence in the form of recording evidence, the master of the recording evidence is presented and heard at the trial. Master recording evidence needs to be heard in person because the recording evidence is very easy to manipulate or engineer. Therefore, if the master of evidence is not clear, then the duplication and duplication of the evidence is carried out an increase in audio quality (enhancing). If the evidence heard in the trial is only the recording evidence that has been improved audio quality, without the master of recording evidence, then the evidence is doubtful and not guaranteed authenticity and integrity.
The next hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 3, 2021 with the event Completing the Evidence of the Applicant’s Letter of Review.