On Wednesday, January 20, 2021, a Review Application Hearing was held against the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 285 K/Pid.Sus/2015 dated February 23, 2015 Jo. Verdict of the Corruption Criminal Court at the High Court of DKI Jakarta No. 72/PID/TPK/2014/PT. DKI dated November 18, 2014 Jo. Verdict of the Corruption Criminal Court at the Central Jakarta District Court No. 44/PID. SUS/TPK/2014/PN. JKT, I’M SORRY. PST dated August 28, 2014 as registered in Register Deed No. 62/AKTA. Pid. SUS/PK/TPK/2020/PN.JKt.Pst, on behalf of Ratu Atut Chosiyah as The Review Applicant.
The session was attended by Ratu Atut Chosiyah accompanied by Novian & Partners with the hearing of Submission of Written Evidence and Applicants for Review and Information of Criminal Law Experts: Dr. Chairul Huda, SH.,MH.
In the statement under oath and before the court, Dr. Chairul Huda, SH.,MH. explaining the reasons for the Application for Review in Criminal Cases, is that there are new circumstances (Novum) that can be in the form of new evidence or new evidence that has never been presented in a previous trial. As for the Second Reason, when in various verdicts it turns out to be contrary to one another. And the third reason, is the error of the judge or a manifest error. The existence of legal errors in speech is one form of manifest error. For example, if there is a recording that has been done sound purification / audio quality improvement (enhancing) that is used as one of the evidence tools, but the original / original recording (which has not been improved audio quality) has never been presented in the examination of the case, then the recording evidence that has been done sound purification / audio quality improvement (enhancing) is not valid, so the actions of the judge who received the recording as a proof tool is a form of real error.
The next hearing will be held on Wednesday, January 27, 2021 with a Forensic Digital Expert Examination presented by the Review Applicant.